Product maps for enterprise infrastructure.No vendor affiliation.

Which hypervisor
does what you need?

Pick two platforms and see, feature by feature, what each one actually does.

  • VMware by Broadcom
  • Nutanix
  • Microsoft Hyper-V
  • Proxmox VE
LiveOct 2026

VMware by Broadcom vs Nutanix

VCF / VVF 9.1AOS 7.x, AHV 11.x

The pairing most VMware shops shortlist first. Where Nutanix folds storage, networking and management into one licence, and where it still leans on someone else's product.

Open comparison →
LiveOct 2026

VMware by Broadcom vs Microsoft Hyper-V

VCF / VVF 9.1Hyper-V 2025, Azure Local

Windows Server licensing set against a VCF subscription. Hyper-V covers the hypervisor cheaply; the question is what you rebuild with Azure Local, System Center, or nothing at all.

Open comparison →
LiveOct 2026

Nutanix vs Microsoft Hyper-V

AOS 7.x, AHV 11.xHyper-V 2025, Azure Local

Two very different routes off VMware — one appliance-led and bundled, one Windows-licensed and assembled. Included features against add-ons, across the whole stack.

Open comparison →
LiveOct 2026

VMware by Broadcom vs Proxmox VE

VCF / VVF 9.1Proxmox VE 9.2

An integrated commercial platform against a free, open-source one. Proxmox holds its own on the hypervisor and the cluster; the gaps sit in the platform services layered above it.

Open comparison →
LiveOct 2026

Nutanix vs Proxmox VE

AOS 7.x, AHV 11.xProxmox VE 9.2

Bundled by design against build it yourself. Both do hyperconverged storage — only one ships a management plane, a support contract and a roadmap around it.

Open comparison →
LiveOct 2026

Microsoft Hyper-V vs Proxmox VE

Hyper-V 2025, Azure LocalProxmox VE 9.2

The two budget routes off VMware, measured against each other rather than against the incumbent. One is tied to Windows Server licensing, the other to a per-socket subscription you can decline.

Open comparison →

Coming next · XCP-ng and OpenStack

  • VMware by Broadcom vs XCP-ng
  • Nutanix vs XCP-ng
  • Microsoft Hyper-V vs XCP-ng
  • Proxmox VE vs XCP-ng
  • VMware by Broadcom vs OpenStack
  • Nutanix vs OpenStack
  • Microsoft Hyper-V vs OpenStack
  • Proxmox VE vs OpenStack
  • XCP-ng vs OpenStack
Every comparison here is sourced from vendor documentation and datasheets; see each page's footer for citations.

CompareHypervisors publishes side-by-side product maps for enterprise infrastructure stacks — what each vendor actually ships, which edition carries it, and where nothing on one side does the job.

Each comparison carries the month it was researched, under its title and again at the foot of the page. Editions, packaging and product names change often; check the vendor pages before you price anything.

Methodology · Privacy notice · Brand

VMware, VMware Cloud Foundation, vSphere, vSAN, NSX and vDefend are trademarks of Broadcom Inc. Nutanix, AHV, Prism and Flow are trademarks of Nutanix, Inc. Microsoft, Hyper-V, Windows Server, Azure and Azure Local are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. All other marks belong to their respective owners.

How do I use this product map?

Reading a row

  • Each row names the real product on both sides, not a checkbox. Read it as "if you rely on this today, that is what replaces it."
  • Dashed pink means nothing on that side does the job, or it is not a product of either company. Those rows need a third party or a change of approach.
  • A small dashed preview chip with a half-filled circle after a product name means the vendor ships it as a technology preview: it counts as an equivalent, but it is not a supported product yet.
  • Click any row, marked ‹ ›, for edition availability and how honest the pairing really is.

Narrowing what you see

  • Pick a category chip to limit the map to one topic.
  • Click any of the four summary tiles to filter to that set, and click it again to clear.
  • Tick Only gaps for just the rows where one side has no equivalent.
  • Type in Filter by products to search names, sub-labels and commentary.
  • The address bar follows the view: the selected row and any filters are in the link, so copy it to share or bookmark exactly what you see.

Buttons

  • Reset view clears the category, search and tile filters and returns you to the top.
  • Dark mode switches the theme. It follows your system setting until you choose.
How to read the gaps, which pairings are not fair trades and the scope of the comparison are in How to read, next to this button. The full source list is at the foot of the page.

Jump to the sources

How do I interpret this product map?

Business requirements

Business requirements must serve as your primary evaluation benchmark. For instance, while Nutanix expanding into an unrelated market, such as footwear, would create a clear portfolio divergence from Broadcom, the critical question is whether that capability aligns with your strategy. Feature gaps are only meaningful if they address an active operational need or strategic vendor preference. Ultimately, prioritize true business value over simple feature parity.

Strength and weaknesses

Overall, VMware by Broadcom’s primary strengths are its granular control and massive ecosystem scale, while Nutanix excels in operational simplicity and flexible licensing. In terms of weaknesses, VMware's environments can be highly complex to manage, and recent corporate transitions have introduced market uncertainty regarding its business model. For Nutanix, costs can scale quickly if licenses are stacked rather than optimized for specific needs, and its technical architecture offers limited support for traditional SAN/NAS configurations, for instance, Nutanix lacks FC support.

Reading the gaps

A dashed pink cell indicates a direct feature gap where no native equivalent exists. {{GAPS}} of the {{ROWS}} rows have no real counterpart on one side, or on neither, but the shape of the split matters more than the count. Nutanix's four gaps are network, security, and compute functions: distributed IDS/IPS, zero-downtime fault tolerance, NVMe memory tiering, and log analytics. VMware's one is data security analytics; its native S3 object store is a technology preview in VCF 9.1, so it counts as an equivalent here, flagged as such in the row. Three more are gaps on both sides — system containers, source code availability and production use at no cost — where the answer is the same whichever platform you pick, and the question becomes whether you need a third product or a different class of platform entirely. If you lean on vDefend distributed IDS/IPS, then a Nutanix move means bringing in a third-party solution with a dedicated security stack, and that cost of change belongs in the comparison. Note also that a gap is not the only way a row can hurt you; uneven pairings may require third-party solutions or operational workarounds, which should be factored into total cost of ownership.

Where a one-to-one row is still not a fair trade

Several pairings are directionally right and materially uneven. vSAN File Services against Nutanix Files is the clearest: the first is basic share support, whereas the Nutanix alternative displaces a NAS. VMware Data Services Manager against NDB is similar. The detail panel calls these out row by row rather than letting the alignment imply parity.

Two things worth knowing before you use this

A dashed cell means the platform ships nothing of its own for that row — not that the need cannot be met. Nearly every gap here has a route around it, and the detail panel says which; what the marker tells you is that the route is yours to buy, integrate and support. And there is no price row anywhere on this site, deliberately: list prices for these platforms bear almost no relationship to what anyone pays, so the licensing rows describe the structure of the cost — the unit of counting, the minimums, what is gated, what sits outside the bundle — which is what actually decides the invoice. How these comparisons are built.

Scope

Neutral greenfield framing. This assessment evaluates a greenfield deployment comparing VMware VCF/VVF 9.1, which features the unified VCF Operations and VCF Automation stack, against Nutanix AOS 7.x and AHV 11.x managed via Prism Central. When evaluating feature availability, it is critical to distinguish between bundled capabilities and separate purchases due to the differing packaging models. VMware generally relies on a comprehensive, bundled licensing approach with specific optional add-ons, whereas Nutanix utilizes a highly modular, granular structure, not withstanding it does offer bundles too. For Nutanix, the base infrastructure (NCI) serves as the foundation, while supplementary capabilities like NCM, NUS, NDB, NKP, and NAI require distinct, separate SKUs. Because both vendors offer various bundles and add-ons, and frequently shift features between licensing tiers during major releases, it is essential to verify all specific feature entitlements directly against your official procurement quote.